Franklin Seal addresses voter confusion
Oct 22, 2004 | 506 views | 0 0 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Letter to the Editor:

Thanks for all the attention you’ve been devoting to the potential confusion and chaos that might ensue if the change of government propositions are voted in. It’s important to point out that even if the method and timing of the changes had been spelled out by the proponents — even if we weren’t being asked to buy a pig in a poke — the proposed changes still amount to a roll back of our new county charter that this community fought for and won back in 1992. Do we really want to return to something closer to the “good” ol’ days of our “good ol’ boy” three-commissioner system?

Thanks also for your coverage of the recent outbreak of negative tactics by certain individuals. (I find it interesting that some of the same individuals launching those attacks were also once closely connected to the good ol’ boy system that we rejected back in 1992). It’s sad that the tone of politics in Grand County has taken an ugly turn. But just in case anybody was inclined to wonder why it suddenly seems “okay” to them to launch such attacks, there’s no need. Simply look to the source, look to our national leadership.

Despite the many layers of power our country’s government involves, despite all our constitutional checks and balances, the office of the President of the United States is still the single most influential tone-setter in our political landscape. He leads by example, whether for good or ill. And led by President Bush, the Republican Party has returned to the type of dirty-tricks politics not seen in this country since Nixon was disgraced by such activities and resigned.

Somehow, it seemed almost easy for us to accept this, to simply shrug our shoulders and look the other way — as long as it remained “out there,” in the realm of national politics. But now the example Bush set over the past four years is finally coming home roost.

It has been many years since politics in Grand County has taken such a negative tone. Previously, it was understood that these types of tactics were simply not acceptable here. Apparently, some locals now think that our collective boundary of what’s acceptable has shifted. Let’s show them they’re wrong.

I hope some folks who supported Bush four years ago will take this into account when they make their choice for president in a couple of weeks.

–Franklin Seal


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.