Community leaders seek solutions to intergenerational poverty
by Molly Marcello
The Times-Independent
Jun 09, 2016 | 9095 views | 0 0 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox (center) introduces the intergenerational poverty initiative before Grand County’s community leaders June 1. Photo by Molly Marcello
Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox (center) introduces the intergenerational poverty initiative before Grand County’s community leaders June 1. Photo by Molly Marcello
More than half of children raised in poverty in Grand County are at risk of remaining in poverty as adults, according to research compiled by the state’s Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission. Now, state and local officials are searching for solutions to break the cycle of intergenerational poverty.

On June 1, Utah Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox and representatives from the Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission met with Grand County community leaders, elected officials and nonprofit directors to discuss a new initiative aimed at combating intergenerational poverty across the state.

“Thirty-one percent of Utah’s child population is at risk of remaining in poverty, [and] 52 percent of Grand County’s [child population], based on our data, is at risk of remaining in poverty as adults,” said Tracy Gruber, senior adviser to the Welfare Reform Commission. Gruber, who is the director of Utah’s Office of Child Care, authored the Intergenerational Poverty Annual Report.

Cox, who currently serves as chairman of the Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission, defined different types of poverty for the group. Situational poverty, he said, is when something negative happens and an individual or a family needs public assistance temporarily.

“You get sick, you lose your job, go through a divorce and find yourself suddenly in poverty needing help,” Cox said. “So you get on these government programs ... three months, six months, a year later you’re back on your feet, you’re off the programs. The welfare programs in place actually work pretty good for those situations.”

But intergenerational poverty, Cox said, speaks to a deeper issue — children who grew up in poverty with a higher likelihood of remaining in poverty as adults.

Department of Workforce Services (DWS) Executive Director Jon Pierpont told the audience that DWS is currently working with multiple state agencies to understand intergenerational poverty and reduce the number of children who remain in poverty as adults. While approximately 70 percent of DWS’ clients experience situational poverty, the remaining 30 percent experience intergenerational poverty, Pierpont said.

“[DWS] started to see that if you spent time as a child on public assistance you had a higher likelihood of being on public assistance as an adult,” Pierpont said. “We could see that four generations back. That was one of those ‘aha’ moments after 24 years of being in the department.”

According to Gruber, 281 Utah children in poverty have parents who also experienced poverty as children.

“The research is very clear that if you grow up experiencing economic challenges, you’re more likely to experience poverty as an adult,” Gruber said.

She explained that the Intergenerational Welfare Reform Commission was formed to focus mainly on children in poverty. So far, the commission has identified four indicators of child well-being — education, family economic stability, health and early childhood development.

“These four areas are tied to research showing that if all four areas of these are addressed in a child’s life they’re more likely to be successful into adulthood,” Gruber said.

As an ecclesiastical leader in Sanpete County, Cox said he has witnessed children who are living in poverty breaking that cycle when given some resources and opportunities.

“I spent time with kids ... they were able and capable of taking new opportunities to change,” Cox said. “Many are in college right now and breaking that cycle.”

Moab Mayor Dave Sakrison told the audience that he was “astounded” when he first heard Grand County’s intergenerational poverty statistics.

Not only are 52 percent of Grand County’s poor children at risk of remaining in poverty as adults, 26 percent of local children from intergenerational poverty families are victims of abuse and neglect and 71 percent of intergenerational poverty youth ages 10 to 17 have some involvement with the Juvenile Justice System, according to the state’s report.

“I am committed, and I think the [Moab] City Council’s committed, and I think that the Grand County Council is committed to do something about this,” Sakrison said. “We owe it to our citizens to do something about this and try to break this continuation of intergenerational poverty. We owe it to them and we owe it to ourselves to do that.”

Grand County Council chairwoman Elizabeth Tubbs said there are several ideas the community could embrace to combat intergenerational poverty locally, including establishing a family resource center and creating a position to coordinate the county’s various nonprofit resources.

Representatives from more than 20 different community groups attended the June 1 intergenerational poverty meeting, including Seekhaven, Moab Regional Hospital, WabiSabi, Utah State University, the Southeastern Utah Health Department, and Four Corners Behavioral Health.

“We might look at having somebody in a paid position to coordinate some of these services. We might look at creating a family resource center, some sort of caring house,” Tubbs said. “... Those are some ideas. How can we bring them all together sort of under one roof and help people access the services? If we have 20 programs that do different things in the community it’s very difficult for one individual to figure out ‘where am I supposed to go to get this help?’”

Cox said that grant funds for Grand County’s local efforts to break the cycle of intergenerational poverty — in whatever form those efforts take shape — will be available from the state “soon.”

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.