Groups rally in Moab for protection of area rivers
by Molly Marcello
Contributing Writer
Apr 30, 2015 | 5595 views | 0 0 comments | 72 72 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Protesters march through downtown Moab on Saturday, April 25 to call for greater protection of the Green and Colorado rivers. Photo by Molly Marcello
Protesters march through downtown Moab on Saturday, April 25 to call for greater protection of the Green and Colorado rivers. Photo by Molly Marcello
slideshow
Members of the Colorado River Indian Tribes and dozens of local residents waved signs reading “Water is Life” and “No Water for Nukes,” while advocating for environmental protection of area rivers during a rally in downtown Moab on April 25.

“When mother earth is under attack, what do we do? Stand up, fight back!” Native-American activist Klee Benally shouted to the crowd.

Participants in Saturday’s rally demanded protection of the Colorado River watershed by opposing what they termed “dirty energy,” including a proposed nuclear power plant near Green River.

The rally was part of Earth Day events that began April 24, when activists and Native-American tribal leaders and elders from the Colorado River Indian Tribes spoke out against the nuclear facility during a community forum at the Moab Arts and Recreation Center. The events were sponsored by a variety of groups, including Living Rivers, Uranium Watch, Canyon Country Rising Tide and Peaceful Uprising.

Bradley Angel, executive director of Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice, said the Colorado River Indian Tribe elders in attendance were part of a successful 1999 campaign against a nuclear waste dump proposed in California’s Ward Valley, which opponents said would have placed toxic material several miles from the Colorado River.

At the two events, speakers from the Colorado River Indian Tribes — which include Mohave, Chemehuevi, Hopi and Navajo people — stressed the importance of protecting the rivers.

Colorado River Indian Tribal Council secretary Amanda Barrera said the tribal council passed a resolution in November formally opposing the proposed nuclear plant because tribal officials believe it will ultimately threaten water quality and quantity for those who live downstream.

Blue Castle Holdings, the company that plans to build the plant, has been granted the right to utilize approximately 55,000 acre-feet of water annually from the Green River, should the proposed plant become operational.

“It’s not to be returned,” Barrera said. “It can’t be.”

Aaron Tilton, president and CEO of Blue Castle Holdings, said findings by the Utah State Engineer and the district court judge in Emery County that water quality or quantity would not be affected by the nuclear power plant support the position Blue Castle has made from the beginning.

“In our analysis, the water use at that plant would have less than an inch change 95 percent of the time,” Tilton told The Times-Independent. “There’s about 4 million acre-feet of water that goes through the Green River [annually].”

Tilton said Blue Castle Holdings is currently preparing the nuclear power plant’s applications, which include federal environmental permits that must be approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

“All the different things related to the site and the environment will be submitted to the NRC ... and they will determine if the site meets suitability requirements,” Tilton said.

Emery County Commissioner Keith Brady said he believes top climate scientist and environmental scientists support the development of nuclear power as an alternative to energy created by fossil fuels and wind and solar options.

“They support nuclear power because it’s more consistent than wind and solar,” Brady said. “There’s no pollution. The technology and safeguards that we have now can monitor any type of a leak.”

At the April 24 forum in Moab, Dave Harper, chairman of the Colorado River Elders Committee, said taking water out of the river during times of drought simply does not make sense. He said the tribal leaders met with Moab Mayor Dave Sakrison last week, proposing that the city council take a formal position against the Blue Castle Project.

“Here we are at Moab, Utah, with a proposed nuclear facility two miles from the river using thousands of gallons of water in a drought season that’s been a drought for the past five, six, seven, eight years,” Harper said. “How sensible is that, to create a facility that’s going to take all the water for energy ... We’re pushing the mayor of Moab to come out and take a position of ‘no.’”

Sakrison said he plans to bring up the issue at a city council meeting “soon.”

Harper said if the Moab city council does not take a stance regarding the nuclear power plant, “that’s a decision too.”

Barrera also argued that Moab’s main economy — tourism —will be greatly impacted by a nuclear power plant.

“I want to commend you guys for fighting it,” said Barrera at the community forum. “You’re the first town to get hit once it hits the Green River. Your tourism will be impacted, just like ours will.”

Tribal council member Johnson Fisher asked the community “why would you want a nuclear power plant next to the river? Why would you want to scare the tourists off?”

But Emery County Commissioner Brady emphasized that the number of jobs created by the Blue Castle Project — which Tilton estimates at 1,000 — would benefit Emery and Grand counties.

“With the jobs that will come in it will be tremendous for our town, our county, and even Grand County, with as many employees as it takes to build as well as to operate,” Brady said. “I am for it — I think it will be good for our counties and our country.”

Benally called the project “nuclear madness.”

“I stand before you to advocate abolishing all nuclear energy and weapons and to leave radium in the ground,” he told community members at the forum. “Shut down Green River [nuclear power plant]. No more Fukushima.”

Tilton said he welcomes protesters’ concerns, and his company will address any issues brought forward.

“We’re glad that they’ve spoken and they come out and voice their concerns, because it allows us time to address it,” Tilton said. “Nuclear power has been around since 1957, it’s very safe and is a very good partner for the surrounding communities.”

But Benally said people must stand up for the environment.

“As long as we live in a society that values mother earth as a commodity, we’re going to have these conflicts,” said Benally. “As long as the commodification of nature exists, this is going to be a war against mother earth and her people.”

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.