County signs agreement to study Book Cliffs enhanced transportation corridor
by Rudy Herndon
Staff Writer
Aug 21, 2014 | 3705 views | 0 0 comments | 40 40 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Grand County is officially on board a proposal to study the feasibility of building an “enhanced transportation corridor” through the Book Cliffs.

By a 6-1 vote on Aug. 19, the county council approved a cooperative agreement that kick-starts the study process; Elizabeth Tubbs voted against the motion put forth by Gene Ciarus.

The planned study will examine the pros and cons of building a new highway and energy pipeline that could connect the Uintah Basin with Interstate 70. It will look at two potential routes through the region: a western corridor through Sego Canyon near Thompson Springs, and an eastern corridor through Hay and East canyons.

Grand County Council chairman Lynn Jackson reiterated that the council is not making any decisions to build a new road or energy pipeline through either corridor.

But local resident Sarah Fields said she believes the council’s vote is a major step in that direction.

“This starts what will be a very long and divisive issue for Grand County, as it was previously when the issue of the Book Cliffs road came before the county,” Fields said.

People who want to build a new road through the region are the same ones who are pushing for the study, she said.

“It’s obviously not an independent report that involves public participation,” Fields said.

Canyonlands Watershed Council Executive Director Chris Baird, a former county councilman who is running for a seat on the council again this year, noted that sportsmen’s groups value the region as one of the prime hunting areas in the entire United States.

“I just hope you know that it’s a really special place,” he said.

Baird ultimately fears that a new corridor would hasten the development of non-conventional fossil fuel projects in the area, including U.S. Oil Sands’ PR Spring project and Red Leaf Resources’ Seep Ridge Block.

“Tar sands and oil shale development is about as bad as it gets,” he said.

But Ciarus said he thinks a new Book Cliffs route would be a benefit to the community, including outdoor recreationists.

Jackson estimated that it will take about six months to complete the study, at which time it will be available for public review.

In the past, Jackson has said he believes the study will show that the Sego Canyon route is both impractical and cost-prohibitive.

An ongoing Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) study projects that it would cost $137 million to build a new highway through Hay Canyon, compared to $307 million for an improved road through Sego Canyon.

Tubbs initially supported a proposal to move forward with the latest study. But now that the separate UDOT study is largely done, she questioned whether another review is necessary.

The latest study is expected to cost about $644,700.

Although the Grand County Council did not commit any funding to the study, the Grand County Transportation Special Service District contributed $10,000 in mineral lease funding.

The rest of the project funding will come from other study participants.

Utah’s School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) has committed $300,000 over two fiscal years, while Uintah County’s transportation district chipped in another $220,000. Uintah and Duchesne counties — along with one of Duchesne County’s special service districts — have contributed lesser amounts.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.