Senators urge president to declare national monument
by Rudy Herndon
Staff Writer
Aug 07, 2014 | 1356 views | 0 0 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Mineral Canyon area west of Moab would be permanently protected under a proposal that calls on President Obama to declare a Greater Canyonlands National Monument. Photo by Rudy Herndon
The Mineral Canyon area west of Moab would be permanently protected under a proposal that calls on President Obama to declare a Greater Canyonlands National Monument. Photo by Rudy Herndon
slideshow
President Barack Obama should use his powers under the federal Antiquities Act to create a Greater Canyonlands National Monument in southeastern Utah, a group of 14 Democratic senators said last week.

In a letter to the president, the senators urged the Obama administration to carve out a 1.8-million-acre monument on existing public lands in Grand, San Juan, Garfield, Wayne and Emery counties.

“Greater Canyonlands is one of our nation’s most stunning, wild and unique landscapes,” they wrote July 30. “It should be protected permanently for the benefit and education of future generations.”

A new national monument that protects the region would build on the past achievements of former Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy, they said.

“The promise of Greater Canyonlands remains unfulfilled,” the letter stated. “As Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell has noted, ‘there are some places that are too special to develop.’ Greater Canyonlands is certainly one of those.”

The proposed monument would surround Canyonlands National Park, running from Natural Bridges National Monument in the south to Labyrinth Canyon in the north.

The largest single chunk of the monument would be in San Juan County, and that concerns San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman.

Lyman said he has no window into the president’s mind. But based on the president’s past statements, he is concerned that Obama would take unilateral action to create a new monument.

“He’s stated that he wants to protect areas, and that if Congress won’t act, he will,” Lyman said.

According to Lyman, the county is proposing to protect some of the same areas that are included in the monument proposal.

Yet whereas the national monument proposal would protect a much larger area, San Juan County has been much more specific with its approach, Lyman said.

He said the county tried to give extra weight to conservationists and Native Americans as it works on Rep. Rob Bishop’s public lands initiative.

According to former Navajo Nation Council Delegate Mark Maryboy, the county is proposing to create a national conservation area on Navajo Nation lands. Lyman said the county will present its ideas to Navajo Nation representatives before its proposals go out for public review.

For more information about the letter, go to: www.greatercanyonlands.org/news/.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.