Moab Oil and Gas...
Apr 03, 2014 | 1750 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
It seems that a looking-for-cash-for-amenities-we’d-love-to-have-unless-we-actually-have-to-pay-for-it-ourselves Grand County Council is forlornly gazing at its extractive neighbors Uintah and Emery counties, searching for a way to get a piece of the action without a) tourists noticing anything, b) having to spend much money, and c) waking up those pesky environmentalists who will whine about their precious canyons, solitude and rock art, anything to stop this great nation from becoming great once again as it was in our forefathers’ time and prevent us from taking back our state lands so we can turn it into malls of children in strollers so that southeast Utah will look like Cincinnati as God intended.

  Their plan is to a) get the oil industry to pay for and build a road, b) charge an outrageous toll to the same oil industry thereafter, c) have enough left over for those amenities, such as a new water treatment plant, that we’ll justify as necessary to deal with impacts of the oil and gas industry.

  The hitch is a) those same pesky environmentalists who might wish to declare the Book Cliffs wilderness, who b) might miraculously win over Rep. Bishop since c) down deep, if rarely expressed, he has an abiding reverence for Mother Earth.

  The workaround is an innocuous study, two of them actually. The studies will look at a) where to put the road, which seems in broad terms pretty well known already, and b) the economic benefits of building it, whose conclusion can be guessed since either Uintah County and/or the oil industry will probably pay for much of it.

  The expectation is that oil-laden trucks will drive to Thompson Springs, drain their tanks into rail cars headed to Green River or Salt Lake City refineries and head back. You’ll never see ‘em, unless of course there’s a reason to go to Farmington, the next oil/gas basin to the south. I suspect there will be reasons.

  I’m dubious it’ll work, but I admit there’s some logic to the council’s inquiry to Uintah County. Still, I don’t like where this is headed.

  Why not a pipeline instead of a road? If it’s just oil being transported, it’s far less invasive. Is it because Grand County can’t charge a toll on a pipeline? Or is it because the road is intended to support a nascent but potentially large-scale tar sands industry on the Tavaputs Plateau, possibly a heavy-oil refinery in Green River to deal with bitumen too thick to transport unless in a heated pipeline, or even a nuclear plant to supply gigawatts of up-front electricity to cook shale that nature didn’t?

  If so, it gets harder to imagine that tourists won’t notice. Moab has a very saleable brand name, and it’s not Moab Oil and Gas.

—Mike Duncan


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.