High Desert Hoofbeats
Ideas worth exploring...
by Sena Taylor Hauer
Mar 27, 2014 | 450 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I need to take a drive. I need to get in my SUV and travel some of the remote roads that currently cross the Book Cliffs and see for myself the dirt routes that could be turned into a useable link between the Uintah Basin and Interstate 70.

When I recently learned that the Grand County Council was resurrecting the hot-button Book Cliffs Highway proposal I first thought, “Yeah, yeah, yeah. I can’t believe that controversial idea is even back on the table.”

Anyone who has lived here the past several years has seen this movie, but some of the players have changed over the past couple of decades. There is a different economic climate, there are different elected officials in place, and there are different options for how such a project could be built and funded.

What isn’t different is the most certain opposition from environmental conservationists and antidevelopment corners who remind us about the impacts we might regret.

The Grand County Council recently and unanimously passed a resolution seeking input from neighboring Uintah County about the feasibility of building an improved road that could link our two counties via the Book Cliffs or Sego Canyon. Studies would look at possible routes and financial figures. Uintah County, which favors a road and has already paved their county’s portion of it, is sure to partner in this information-gathering effort.

I think these ideas are worth exploring, if only for settling the proposal once and for all. I believe the Grand County Council can be open-minded when examining cost, impacts and feasibility issues. The seven members of recent and current county councils likely know that their privilege to sit at the dais is largely the result of actions by a three-member county commission that was thrown out by voters more than 20 years ago – voters who staged a coup that blew up over the commission’s unwillingness to consider citizens’ desire and concerns, and the original idea to build a highway across the Book Cliffs. That change in government occurred because voters wanted a more diverse electorate they hoped would better represent the citizens of Grand County.

With the Book Cliffs Highway back on the agenda, the current council will be put to the test. I support the baby steps that might be taken as Grand and Uintah counties gather information about whether the project is a worthwhile benefit to our county, and whether it can serve our industrial and recreational potential in a manner that doesn’t outweigh leaving the lands as remote and rough as they currently are. The project would most certainly be a boon to Uintah County, whose mineral, oil and gas harvests might be more profitable with easier access to an interstate and rail siding.

Those opposing the project have valid concerns about the sensitive landscape of the Book Cliffs and the rich Native American rock art of Sego Canyon near Thompson. But an improved road may not need to go near Sego Canyon, instead accessing Hay Canyon many miles to the east on the Cisco desert. There is currently a four-wheel-drive road from Hay Canyon up and over the Book Cliffs. The road’s steep grades and rough features may not meet federal standards or qualify for federal funding, but private development could literally pave the way. Beyond that, Grand County might be able to collect substantial revenues from energy companies that would use the road.

From a recreational standpoint, a better road could greatly shorten the travel distance between Moab and eastern Utah’s Dinosaur National Monument, Flaming Gorge and even Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks. There again, business advocates might smile on the opportunities, but conservationists might groan at the thought of more tourists here.

Grand and Uintah counties have a lot to talk about, and the figurative roadblocks make the project a long shot at best. Until the dialogue gets under way, though, I think I’ll take a drive.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.