Dangerous pipeline...
Mar 13, 2014 | 816 views | 0 0 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The reality about the Dead Horse Lateral gas pipeline does not come from a PR representative sitting in corporate offices, but from on-the-ground observations of the work being done on site. Several points about the pipeline are not included in the T-I article in the March 6, 2014 issue of the paper.

First, several individuals and the Sierra Club have been involved for over one year in asking questions about the feasibility of the pipeline, raising concerns about public safety during construction and operation, and providing comments to the Bureau of Land Management about those concerns. Our involvement is not new or stimulated by others.

Second, there are serious public safety issues with construction of the pipeline that I and others have documented with photos and video. Some of these issues have been brought to the attention of the BLM, which is responsible for monitoring the work. Periodic visits I’ve made to the worksite over the past month have found numerous instances where construction is not in compliance with the stipulations issued by the BLM; some of those incidents are chronic or repetitive, such as no dust suppression.

Third, the pipeline is in an area where half a million people visit and recreate every year. An uncoated pipeline placed primarily on the ground (not buried) is subject to corrosion and scratching as it moves across rocks. The pipeline will sit on the ground within a few feet of Dubinky Well Road. OHV and motorbikes could easily go off-road and hit the pipe. A stray bullet from a hunter could damage the pipe.

Do we really want to take the chance that our safety depends on promises that nothing will happen? Regardless of the quality of pipeline construction or psi of gas in the pipe, an above-ground pipeline near a heavily used campground (Horsethief) will always be a safety issue. In an area with such heavy recreational use, an exposed pipeline will always be a danger to visitors. The bigger picture, of course, is that Fidelity (with BLM approval) has permanently destroyed the Big Flat/Deadhorse Point viewshed, while adding to the mix the danger of an exploding pipeline.

It is hard to imagine a worse location for both an oil and gas field and an above-ground pipeline.

—Bill Rau

Castle Valley

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.