High Desert Hoofbeats
Rational dialogue needed...
by Sena Taylor Hauer
Feb 06, 2014 | 481 views | 0 0 comments | 20 20 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The prairie dogs on the Cisco desert saw their shadows Sunday and sure enough, Monday morning dawned with snow, heralding six more weeks of winter. We could use more winter for the sake of our water supply in the coming year but I hope it won’t be like the last six weeks: dry but cold, cold, cold.

I’m trying to remember when we haven’t worried about our water supply, and it seems to have been decades or more. If it’s true that there have been more wars fought in the West over water than over any other commodity, then it’s a theme our pioneer state builders fretted over too, when there wasn’t even global warming to give them nightmares. Our fickle water supply has been right up there with issues such as politics, personal vanity and premarital sex for heaven knows how long. It’s a given.

But that doesn’t discount the fact that our water quantity and quality is becoming more precious. It underscores it. There is a finite supply of water on our globe, but an ever-growing mass of people who need it to survive, under warmer conditions.

In the Moab Valley there are efforts afoot to rally support for more thorough monitoring and allocation of our water sources. Former Grand County Council member Chris Baird is the executive director of the Canyonlands Watershed Council, a five-year-old group that is watchdogging local water use in the face of global and local climate change. This organization is calling into question proposals of the Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency, which for years has been a somewhat quiet but powerful arm of local government. Members of the GWSSA board, of which Baird has been a member, would argue that their chief role is to create rational water policy. One’s definition of “rational” is the rubbing point, as I believe current members of the GWSSA board would consider their thinking as being rational.

GWSSA last year floated an idea to divert more water from Mill Creek into Ken’s Lake during the winter, in an effort to stockpile enough water to meet the historic irrigation requirements in our community. Many Spanish Valley farmers have been operating with half or less of their customary supplies the last two years. While few, if any, like to see green fields turn brown and farmers lose livelihoods to dead crops, at stake is the health of Mill Creek, and so on and so forth as the wet stuff trickles down the line. A third big player at the table is the Bureau of Land Management, which has the final say in whether more water can be taken out of Mill Creek to satisfy the 150 or so users.

The rains of September seemed to put a damper on diversion talks. Any change will be predicated on years of studies that would seek to determine more accurate supply estimates and allow conjecture on the health impacts of decreasing creek flows during winter. It seems like an idea worth exploring, akin to power plants storing energy at night to use during peak times in the day. But it’s probably not all that simple. While GWSSA studies the supply, others will be studying the impacts, in true historic divisiveness.

My hope is that battle lines can be softened with public dialogue that works toward solutions. The BLM has a pivotal task at playing the middleman. There’s no reason that we as a community can’t discuss the sensitivities and work on a plan that is beneficial to man and land. It’s what we must do, whether or not there are six more weeks of winter.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.