Care center seeks legislative changes to retirement system
by Rudy Herndon
Staff Writer
Jan 30, 2014 | 741 views | 0 0 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A simple change to state law could help Canyonlands Care Center cut its operating costs by well over $100,000 a year.

The Utah State Legislature’s associate general counsel is drafting a bill that would allow the facility to opt out of the state’s public employee retirement system. 

Although the bill had not been filed as of press time, three state lawmakers have already thrown their support behind the proposal, according to Canyonlands Care Center Administrator Roy Barraclough.

State Sen. David Hinkins, R-Orangeville, will team up with Rep. Jerry Anderson, R-Price, and Rep. Kay McIff, R-Richfield, to guide the bill through the 2014 legislative session.

Barraclough recently met with the lawmakers, and he said there was a “pretty strong” consensus among them that they just need to fix the Utah Retirement Systems (URS) law.

“I left the meeting (on Jan. 15) quite positive, quite optimistic, that this is going to happen,” he told the Canyonlands Health Care Special Service District (CHCSSD) Board on Jan. 16.

Under the current law, the quasi-governmental care center’s board is required to contribute to the URS program. But the facility continues to operate in the red, and interim CHCSSD Board chairman Doug Fix noted that a significant amount of its annual shortages — about 16 percent — can be traced to the URS requirements.

If the legislature amends the law, Barraclough estimates that the facility will save somewhere between $120,000 to $130,000 per year.

That compares to an estimated annual payroll of $1 million, according to Barraclough.

As things currently stand, Barraclough said that a majority of full-time employees on that payroll will never benefit from the URS contributions.

Although the facility does have some long-term employees, more than half of its staff will not stick around long enough to vest into the URS program, he said.

It takes four years to reach that point, yet Barraclough said that many of the care center’s staffers move on to positions elsewhere after one year to 18 months on the job.

“It really isn’t applicable to our facility,” he said.

Likewise, Barraclough said one key rationale behind the URS program does not apply to the care center. 

Generally speaking, the program is designed to benefit public employees who typically earn less than those who work in the private sector. But Barraclough noted that the care center is competing with hospitals and other organizations that pay their employees higher wages.

“In our case, that doesn’t fit,” he said.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.