Care for the land...
Mar 07, 2013 | 1282 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I was deeply disappointed to hear Phil Mueller welcoming the oil industry with open arms to Grand County on his radio show on KCYN. I guess he missed the free screening of the documentary “The Tipping Point” (Feb. 19, at the library) about the tar sands mining in Alberta, Canada. It would also be a shame if he did not get a chance to hear Francois Paulette speak about the situation in Canada and the reason he came to Moab.

Mr. Paulette is a native Indian who lived in the area of the tar sands in Alberta. He talked about high rates of certain cancers in his people (cancers associated with exposure to hydrocarbons), deformed fish, and toxins from the ponds seeping into the land and polluting their rivers.

I am not a geologist, biologist or soil expert but this is what I understand. The oil/tar sands are located “close to the surface” (20 feet) in this area. To get to the oil/tar sands the oil companies will need to remove 20 feet of the landscape- plants, soil, rocks, etc. Then they will remove the precursor of oil from the sand and then put it all back the way they found it. They say they will no longer be using the toxic chemicals that were used in Alberta, Canada. Now they are using citric acid, which makes it all better. And according to Phil’s guest, “this is only the beginning.”

Again, I am not an expert on anything, but this I do know: Utah has a very fragile environment due to the lack of water. I do not want to see areas where the landscape has been removed because I do not believe you can put it back the way it was. You can re-plant all you want but that does not mean it will re-grow. More likely, undesirable plants will blow in and take over the landscape.

Alberta, Canada, is very green with lots of rivers and tributaries. Mr. Paulette remarked that “you have no water here” why would you risk polluting the small amount of water that you do have. Using tar/oil sands to obtain oil is more expensive and damaging to the environment than drilling for oil. More emissions are created in this process by bulldozers, trucks, and processing plants. Is it worth it for Moab and the surrounding area?

And why did Mr. Paulette come to Moab? He came to tell us to take care of our land and to think about what we are doing. And most important, he wants us to consider what we will leave behind for our grandchildren.

—Barb Crossan


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.