Proposed Grand County TRT increase fails by 3-3 vote
by Craig Bigler
contributing writer
Sep 04, 2008 | 724 views | 2 2 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A proposal by some Grand County Council members to increase the transient room tax by enough to pay for additional county employees that the council has authorized failed Tuesday night by a 3-3 vote.

Council members Bob Greenberg, Jim Lewis, and Audrey Graham voted for the increase. Gene Ciarus, Jerry McNeely, and Joette Langianese voted against. Pat Holyoak was absent.

Greenberg and Lewis co-sponsored the proposal, with Greenberg calling it the most extensively debated topic the current council has addressed. He said the concerns of both the lodging industry and the public have been well-voiced, but pointed out that 69 percent of respondents to a poll on The Times-Independent website favored the increase.

“I would like to remind you... that sometime in October the chickens will come home to roost on what we decided were essential services for Grand County and funded out of our reserves,” Greenberg said. “We can’t continue to support what we decided were critical county functions out of our savings, so I would encourage the council to be at least prudent.”

Lewis said he understands that the lodging industry fears travel will drop off because of gasoline prices. He expressed admiration for the work of the Moab Area Travel Council and the money tourism brings to the county. But Lewis also spoke of the impacts of tourism on county services and the ability to cover costs of them.

After raising the specter of “sticker shock” from the recent property tax notices, Lewis talked of the dilemma facing the tourist industry – raise property taxes more or raise more money from tourists.

“I wish it could be zero,” he said. “But a slight increase on these visitors I see as a positive way to distribute that taxation because we still have the need [for more revenue].” The uranium industry paid a large amount of money in taxes when it dominated the economy, Graham said, adding that the county is still stuck with paying for the impact of that industry. “The mess that was left over,” Graham said.

Graham said she does not believe such a small increase in room costs, averaging 69 cents per night, would hurt tourism and that the increase would be the responsible thing to do. She added that she is working to find a way to influence the state to allow TRT funds to help cover airport costs. The airport is now funded from the county’s general fund, but its benefits are realized mostly by visitors, she said.

McNeely said the council must listen to the lodging industry. He said he expects Greenberg to not listen but Lewis “should know better.” A TRT increase would take money away from the lodging industry, McNeely said, adding that he fears the next step would be for the state to come in and get a share. “Don’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg,” he said.

Langianese said the lodging industry is not totally against the tax increase. The problem is how the additional money will be used, she said. The council should listen to the travel council and lodging association because its members know the business and they adamantly oppose the increase, Langianese said. “We’ve taxed our county to death,” she said.

Noting the increase could take some of the burden off the property tax, Langianese said if tourism drops, which could easily happen, the money will have to come from somewhere. “The timing is not good, not this year,” she said.

Council chairman Ciarus said that tourism is too volatile to be a reliable source of funding for county services and the burden on the county does not come from people who stay in motels. “It’s the ones who go out and camp,” he said, adding, “I really have a hard time with this.”

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.