State board approves oil sand development in Book Cliffs
by Steve Kadel
staff writer
Nov 01, 2012 | 1961 views | 0 0 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print


A state panel has approved the nation’s first commercial oil sands project, located in eastern Utah’s Book Cliffs. But opponents of the project say they will likely challenge the ruling in court.

The Utah Water Quality Board voted 9-2 last week to uphold the state Division of Water Quality’s decision allowing the 212-acre PR Spring project to proceed. The board did not require a groundwater pollution permit, indicating the area’s groundwater is too deep to be affected by runoff.

The decision confirms “substantial evidence” that no shallow groundwater exists in the area and that the project would have “insignificant” effect on any potential groundwater, U.S. Oil Sands CEO Cameron Todd said.

“The decision also highlights the outstanding environmental attributes of U.S. Oil Sands’ extraction process, which uses only a non-toxic bio-solvent derived from citrus to remove oil from the sands,” he said. “Our process uses no tailings ponds and recycles 95 percent of its water.”

Todd said the ruling “illustrates the merits that our responsible approach to oil sands development has for the environment and local communities.”

U.S. Oil Sands doesn’t fear a possible court fight, he said. Rather, Todd said he welcomes a thorough review that shows the company has the highest industry and environmental standards.

An attorney representing Western Resource Advocates and legal ally Living Rivers of Moab said it is “highly likely” they will file a motion with the Utah Court of Appeals to stop the project.

“We disagree with the Water Quality Board’s characterization of Utah law as it applies to this permit and how they classify groundwater,” said Rob Dubuc. “This decision goes against clear evidence, already in the record, that there is groundwater at the mine site.”

Opponents of the project argued that groundwater in the area would be polluted if oil extraction proceeds.

“The whole place is surrounded by groundwater,” said John Weisheit, conservation director for the Moab-based Living Rivers. “It’s there.”

He added that oil exploration also would “destroy the herds of deer and elk up there.”

Dubuc agreed, saying the decision “could have a lasting effect on the hunting and recreation economy in Utah.”

The Utah Board of Oil, Gas and Mining (UDOGM) still must give final approval, but Dubuc said chances that UDOGM will reverse the water board’s decision are virtually nil.

“This is pretty much the final decision,” he said.

There will be a 30-day comment period after the water board officially issues its written opinion. Dubuc could not say how quickly opponents would seek court intervention, but added, “I don’t imagine it will take very long.”

U.S. Oil Sands, which is based in Calgary, Alberta, has been pushing PR Springs since 2005. The company says the site will produce 2,000 barrels of oil each day. Company officials have said production is expected to begin in late 2013.

The company received Utah state approval for a groundwater discharge permit in 2008, and a large mine permit for oil sands development in 2009. A challenge was filed in 2011 after U.S. Oil Sands requested a modification of the permitted project. Utah Administrative Law Judge Sandra Allen ruled in favor of the company in May and made her recommendation to the Water Quality Board.
Share This Article |
similar stories

BLM gives green light to Hatch Point potash exploration | 17 days ago by Steve Kadel
staff writer

Due to expected water shortages, artificial turf being considered for OSTA ball fields | 24 days ago by Steve Kadel
Staff Writer

Utah congressman seeks federal land compromise | 10 days ago by Steve Kadel
Staff Writer

May Moab Art Walk features wide variety of art, craft styles | 10 days ago

Castle Valley Comments May16, 2013 | 3 days ago by Ron Drake

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.