Uintah County plan to pave Seep Ridge Road raises concerns among Grand County officials
by Charli Engelhorn
contributing writer
Apr 21, 2011 | 3966 views | 0 0 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) officials have approved the paving of Seep Ridge Road from Uintah County to the Grand County line, leaving some Grand County Council members concerned about the possible impacts to the county.

Currently a two-lane road surfaced with gravel in the north end and shale in the south, Seep Ridge Road stretches from the eastern edge of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation boundary, approximately nine miles south of Ouray, Utah, to Interstate 70. The BLM decision will enable Uintah County to pave 44.5 miles of the road, beginning at the Uintah/Grand County line and moving north, officials said.

In the late 1980s, an effort on the part of local officials to pave Seep Ridge Road – referred to then as the Book Cliffs Highway – was one of several issues that sparked public backlash and led to the dissolution of the county’s then-commission form of government and the creation of the council form of government.

Grand County Council members this week discussed the possible fiscal impact of the project for Grand County. Specifically, council members voiced concern that possible increased traffic coming from the paved portion of the road into the unpaved section in Grand County might require additional funding for road maintenance, law enforcement, and search and rescue/Emergency Medical Services.

Council member Audrey Graham presented a proposed letter to Uintah County officials requesting the development of a memorandum of understanding between the two counties to establish an agreement to safeguard Grand County against future impact.

Bill Jackson, Grand County Road Department supervisor, told council members he has reviewed the BLM’s environmental assessment (EA) for the project and believes paving the road in Uintah will likely have minimal impact to Grand County.

“The EA finding is that the impact for Grand County would not be significant,” he said. “I think, eventually, there might be some impact, but who knows how much. The road is already impacted by oil and gas vehicles, and I don’t see that traffic would increase that much to change that impact.”

According to the environmental assessment, the project would improve conditions for oil and gas wells and other energy-related facility operators in the Book Cliffs area and reduce the costs of maintenance and support services for the vehicles and equipment used in those operations. The document also stated that more than 100,000 acres of the Book Cliffs area would be managed to continue to afford visitors and citizens the “same level of solitude and primitive recreation use” as they enjoy now.

The EA does note the possible need for increased law enforcement in the Book Cliffs area to minimize vandalism, risks to human health and safety, and traffic violations that may result from the road being paved.

BLM officials addressed the possible maintenance costs to Grand County, stating that the additional maintenance work could cause Grand County to shift its limited resources to their portion of Seep Ridge Road from more populated areas of the county. The EA also notes concerns that Grand County will receive pressure from the public to pave its portion of the road connecting with Interstate 70. That idea was revived in 2007 but dismissed because it was estimated to cost $6 million per mile.

Jackson said that neither he nor other road department workers feel any pressure to change the current conditions of Grand’s portion of the road.

“I don’t think there’s much to do now,” he said. “It’s too early to really tell what the impact could be.”

Council member Jim Nyland agreed with Jackson, saying that he wants to avoid having a knee-jerk reaction to the project.

“I don’t want to get into the habit of sending letters to other counties about what they are doing in their own jurisdictions,” he said.

Graham said she still believes an agreement with Uintah County would give Grand County options concerning any potential financial impact, but she agreed with the council to take no action at this time.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.