Unilateral action...
Jan 23, 2013 | 1942 views | 0 0 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The recent decision by the Grand County Council to send a letter to President Obama opposing the creation of a Greater Canyonlands National Monument raises several serious questions.

First, the council members appear to represent only themselves, not the wider citizens’ community they are meant to represent. Less than a month since the new council was sworn in, it has taken this action. What was the motivation behind the quick action?

Second, was a sample of public opinion conducted before the council acted? The council appears to have acted without any sampling of the opinions of the Grand County community. Simply living in the county does not, in itself, mean one knows how everyone is thinking.

Were young people asked their opinion? They will be the eventual beneficiaries of whatever decisions are made about land use in the county. Were all segments of the county’s citizens provided with a forum for expressing their views? I don’t think such representation occurred.

Thus, the council gives the appearance of catering to special interests, rather than the long-term needs of the entire community. The county council members acted in a way they say they do not want the Obama administration to act—unilaterally, without input and discussion of the issues by all segments of the county’s citizens.

Third, where is the analysis that shows that off-road users are major economic contributors to county income? The letter itself suggests no such analysis has been done.

Thus, we can conclude that the county council is operating without a well-designed study and understanding of the economic factors in the county.

—Bill Rau

Castle Valley

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.