Reasonable balance...
Mar 14, 2013 | 786 views | 0 0 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I have read recent articles supporting the expansion of the “Greater Canyonlands” area to become a bigger national park and it has left me shaking my head.

Forty years ago, my father witnessed an interesting conversation between an old cowboy and another individual who commented about how big his boss’s ranch was. The cowboy said, “Yep, he didn’t want much land, just the section next to his own.”

I find this to be the case with those who think the expansion of a park is the only solution.

Someone wrote that technology would make it so alternative energy sources would make it unnecessary to use these lands years from now and the land should be protected. I thought it already was protected with the laws we have in place. Just try to drill, or mine, or get a commercial permit to take a tourist out. It is not an easy thing to do, as there are strict rules regarding such things.

Technology is improving as we speak. Rather than pulling back, we need to be optimistic about our future. Multiple use of Utah lands makes the most sense. Here in Grand County we have a lot of infrastructure that has to be supported or replaced. Our water lines are decaying, another new school needs to be built, our jail is getting antiquated, and the list goes on and on, and will go on for generations to come.

Tourism alone cannot sustain our future needs. There must be a reasonable balance, and the argument to constantly expand the entire southern end of our state into one gigantic park is shortsighted if not downright selfish.

—Kelly M. Green

Moab


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.