Logical step...
Jul 18, 2013 | 1384 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
I am disappointed with the Grand County Council’s ruling regarding Negro Bill Canyon.

As we all know, this was not the canyon’s original name. When it was updated many years ago to reflect a more sensitive reality, there were no negative repercussions to the “historical fabric” of Grand County as far as I am aware. To update the name once again seems to me a logical step.

As Grandstaff Canyon, this beautiful spot would continue to be named after the same pioneer settler. I fail to see how any history would be “lost” as a result.

I commend Louis Williams for his extensive research, and agree completely that we as a community can, and should, be both historically accurate and racially sensitive.

—Jenna Woodbury


Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.