Group lists Arches National Park, Desolation Canyon as places ‘too wild to drill’
by Lisa J. Church
Staff Writer
Aug 01, 2013 | 1669 views | 0 0 comments | 46 46 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Two popular tourist destinations in Utah – Arches National park and Desolation Canyon ­– are included on a list issued by the Wilderness Society of places deemed “too wild to drill.” Arches topped the list, while Desolation Canyon took the fourth spot among 12 places across the country that, according to a report from the conservation group, are “being threatened by oil and gas drilling but should be protected.”

“From well-known places like Arches National Park to less protected regions of Utah like Desolation Canyon, the potential for oil and gas drilling threatens the very reasons these places deserve protection – they hold special wildlife, recreation, cultural and scientific values,” Nada Culver, senior director for agency policy at The Wilderness Society, said in a news release. “There are opportunities right now to safeguard these lands and we need to ensure that we strike a balance that puts conservation on equal ground with oil and gas development.”

In 2008, several parcels located near Arches and Canyonlands national parks were included in proposed oil and gas lease offerings by the Bureau of Land Management. Environmental groups, including The Wilderness Society, filed a lawsuit which ultimately stopped the sale of some 77 proposed parcels at that time.

Environmental activist Tim DeChristopher disrupted the December 2008 lease sale in Salt Lake City by placing winning bids totaling $1.8 million on 14 of the controversial parcels with no intention to pay for them. DeChristopher, who became known as Bidder 70 – the number on his bidding paddle – was later found guilty of two felony charges and served 21 months in federal prison for his actions.

The controversial leases were taken off the auction list in early 2009 by then-Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar. Most of the leases have remained off the auction block, including those located near Arches and Canyonlands national parks.

The Wilderness Society also claims that Desolation Canyon “has also become the target of oil and gas drilling.” The group says more than 1,300 wells were approved for drilling in the canyon, “some of them right up to the edge of the river,” and argues that large drilling operations, and providing housing for those workers, has made it difficult to find lodging for those who wish to visit Desolation Canyon.

The BLM has said restrictions included in the approval of those drilling projects has actually reduced the number of well pads and allowable drilling sites. Well pads are barred within one-half mile or line-of-sight of the Green River and within two miles of the Sand Wash campground and boat launch for Desolation Canyon. Development in the Green River floodplain and Nine Mile Canyon is also prohibited, according to the BLM.

But Wilderness Society officials said that because there is still potential for oil and gas drilling in many nearby places, “the threat still exists.”

“There are many different qualities that make these places special, but they all have one thing in common: they are threatened by oil and gas drilling,” said Jamie Williams, president of The Wilderness Society. “Keeping these places safe from drilling maintains the strong community and economic benefits that they currently offer, and provides a balance to the millions of acres of federal lands already open to oil and gas development.”

Other areas named on The Wilderness Society list include Chaco Canyon in New Mexico, Thompson divide in Colorado and the Los Padres National Forest in California.

The full report is available online at wilderness.org/article/too-wild-drill.

Copyright 2013 The Times-Independent. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.